The picture presented by gun crime statistics is gruesome. Anyone looking at the gun death statistics cannot ignore the fact that gun crime has been increasing over the years and that a strong gun control legislation is the need of the hour. Let us examine a few items of gun crime statistics and analyze them so as to understand the situation correctly.
Gun crime statistics demolish the argument we sometime hear in a gun control debate in support of uncontrolled gun ownership. Advocates of unfettered gun ownership have been claiming that arming people with guns is the best way to protect them from being victims of crimes. But the reality seems to be far removed from this claim. Gun control facts show that places that have a high concentration of guns report a large number of children getting killed by guns. This fact alone will refute the argument that guns give protection. Guns only increase the risk of gun death.
One of the most disturbing data obtained from gun crime statistics is that thirty nine percent of the children know where to find the guns in their houses. If there is a gun in a house, the chance of some kid living in that house getting hold of the gun is quite high. Nothing can be more dangerous than children getting hold of guns since the children neither know how to handle the guns properly nor are aware of the consequences of using them inappropriately.
Against the gun crime statistics like the above tilting the balance of gun control pros and cons in favor of gun control, the anti gun control activists refuse to accept the realities. The National Rifles Association (NRA) which has been leading the opposition to strong gun control laws functions not like a club as its name suggests but as a highly paid lobby. The NRA has been urging the legislators to be on its side in the gun control debate, threatening them with defeats in primaries if they would not toe its line. The threat seems to be working as revealed by the actions of some legislators who, with a view to obstruct the process of strengthening the gun control measures, have been making rules to ensure that organizations like the National Institute of Health will find it difficult even to study gun violence.
Anyone who studies gun control pros and cons should be assumed to have an open mind. The purpose of understanding both sides of an issue like gun control can only be for weighing the arguments in favor of both sides against each other and decide which side has more weight. This is the logical, rational, sensible and fair way of looking at gun control pros and cons. But the anti gun control groups do not adopt this approach. These people do not even seem to take a serious look at gun death statistics. They have already decided that gun control pros and cons support their stand against stricter gun control laws. So they will either ignore gun crime statistics or rubbish them.
Considering the fact that organizations like the NRA (National Rifles Association) take a distorted view of gun control pros and cons by presuming that gun control facts are in favor of their preconceived opinions, we have to conclude that their motives are questionable. Questions like whether the NRA is a club of sportsmen as its name suggests or a lobby of gun owners arise in the minds of independent observers of the gun control debate that has been going on for the past few decades. Notwithstanding the claim of the NRA that it is a political organization, it should be considered only a lobbyist body. Support for this view comes from its actions.
The NRA is known to have been coercing legislators to toe its line by threatening them that it will work for their defeat in the primaries, if they do not. This threat seems to have had its effect on some legislators who have started working to promote the cause of the NRA. Not bothering to look at the gun control pros and cons and act in a fair manner, these legislators have been engaged in creating rules that will block independent bodies like the National Institute of Health even from studying gun violence. Such attempts may not tilt the gun control pros and cons in favor of the anti gun lobby. We have incontrovertible gun crime statistics based on the experience of many countries that the smaller the number of guns in a society, the smaller will be the number of murders. This kind of data leave us in no doubt as to what inference we could draw by studying gun control pros and cons.
I would like to write a gun control article. You may ask me why. There are so many gun control articles doing the round already. What difference will one more article make? It may not. Still I would like to write one. I am not a great writer. But I think writing skills are not needed to present some gun control facts.
The idea of my writing a gun control article is to join the gun control debate in my own humble way. What can I add to the plethora of arguments discussing gun control pros and cons? One thing I would like to include in my gun control article is some gun death statistics. The reason I want to do this is that I believe that facts and figures can convey a message more powerfully than logical and rhetorical statements. You might have come across some of this information in other gun control articles. But I would like to present them in such a way that my readers will be able to draw some quick conclusions without going through the voluminous writing on the subject of gun control. I am listing the gun control facts I plan to discuss in my gun control article.
1) Americans are the largest gun owning group in the world. About 50 percent of the guns available in the world are owned by us. What is wrong with this? Nothing except the fact that we constitute only about 5 percent of the population of the world!
2) Considering the information given above, it can only be expected that a greater proportion of Americans would be having guns, Yes, the expectation is right. But the holding is a bit high. The population of guns in our country is close to the population of people in our country. This indicated by the ratio of 89 guns for 10 people!
3) We can see the consequence of the above two facts. More than half of the homicides in America are committed with guns. The ratio is 60 percent. More guns lead to gun crimes. This seems to be the logical connection
4) I will also include a disturbing fact in my gun control article. It is about the safety of children and women. Studies show that women and children are likely to become the victims of gun violence, if the house they live in has a gun!