The picture presented by gun crime statistics is gruesome. Anyone looking at the gun death statistics cannot ignore the fact that gun crime has been increasing over the years and that a strong gun control legislation is the need of the hour. Let us examine a few items of gun crime statistics and analyze them so as to understand the situation correctly.
Gun crime statistics demolish the argument we sometime hear in a gun control debate in support of uncontrolled gun ownership. Advocates of unfettered gun ownership have been claiming that arming people with guns is the best way to protect them from being victims of crimes. But the reality seems to be far removed from this claim. Gun control facts show that places that have a high concentration of guns report a large number of children getting killed by guns. This fact alone will refute the argument that guns give protection. Guns only increase the risk of gun death.
One of the most disturbing data obtained from gun crime statistics is that thirty nine percent of the children know where to find the guns in their houses. If there is a gun in a house, the chance of some kid living in that house getting hold of the gun is quite high. Nothing can be more dangerous than children getting hold of guns since the children neither know how to handle the guns properly nor are aware of the consequences of using them inappropriately.
Against the gun crime statistics like the above tilting the balance of gun control pros and cons in favor of gun control, the anti gun control activists refuse to accept the realities. The National Rifles Association (NRA) which has been leading the opposition to strong gun control laws functions not like a club as its name suggests but as a highly paid lobby. The NRA has been urging the legislators to be on its side in the gun control debate, threatening them with defeats in primaries if they would not toe its line. The threat seems to be working as revealed by the actions of some legislators who, with a view to obstruct the process of strengthening the gun control measures, have been making rules to ensure that organizations like the National Institute of Health will find it difficult even to study gun violence.
There are many gun control articles that talk about the second amendment. One recent gun control essay completely ignored gun deaths and gun death statistics focusing instead on the need for guns to prevent “tyranny.” That’s crazy. Guns don’t prevent tyranny, Democracy prevents tyranny!
In another on line gun control essay no mention was made of the economic damages caused by gun deaths that are estimated at$3.7 billion a year. That is $3.7 BILLION!
How can there be any rational discussion of gun control pros and cons when gun control facts are ignored? Sometimes a person might believe that the gun control debate is only about gun owners loosing the privilege of buying assault rifles while ignoring important facts such as the United States being ranked worse that South Africa for gun deaths per 100,000 citizens! The debate is about the harm caused by guns. Gun owners need to stop crying about themselves and think of the greater good.
Any gun control essay worth reading must consider the facts. For example, it is a fact that the more guns that are in an area will result in higher suicide rates. Or the fact that there is a strong correlation between States and regions with higher levels of household firearm ownership and the increased number of children dying from homicide in that area.
Gun control is a matter of public safety not “collectors rights!”
There are very few issues that have remained in the public arena with no progress for such a long time as gun control has been. This topic seems to evoke strong feelings with some people stubbornly opposing any move towards gun control and other people, perturbed by the picture presented by gun crime statistics, demanding immediate action on the part of the government.
We need to find answers to two questions. One, why is gun control such an important issue? Two, why is it that this issue has defied a solution for such a long time, with the gun control debate going on eternally?
To understand the importance of gun control, we should take a look at the gun death statistics. We will pick out just a few gun control facts to understand the present scenario. Gun control facts show that the United States owns a very high proportion of the privately owned guns in the world. In terms of percentage, 50 percent of the guns of the world are in our country. Yet, our country holds only 5 percent of the population of the world!
The second fact that may interest people studying the gun control pros and cons is that in the US itself, regions that have a high proportion of gun ownership report a high proportion of children becoming gun death victims. Both these facts put together go to show that the higher the gun ownership, the higher are the crimes. This is confirmed by another study which has found that areas with a large number of guns also have a large number of suicides occurring.
Coming to the second question as to why the gun control issue has remained unsolved for a long time, the answer lies in the fact that there is a strong anti gun law lobby operating in our country. The campaign against gun control is spearheaded by the National Rifles Association (NRA). The NRA claims to be an association of sportsmen but behaves like a lobby because of its unreasonable stand. It will not be moved by facts like the one that Australia has been successful in bringing down its crimes by 60 percent as a result of a strong anti gun law implemented by the government. Following a policy of no compromise, organizations like the NRA have been successfully scuttling all moves towards better gun control.
The title of this article may give the impression that we need to learn to live with gun death.No. What the title really seeks to convey is that we should do something to arrest the phenomenon of gun death which seems to be only going up, notwithstanding the assertions made by some people supporting uncontrolled gun ownership. I think that there will be no dispute about the fact that gun death is much different from natural death and even from accidental death and is highly preventable if only ourlegislators are willing to appreciate the scenario depicted by gun control facts and decide to take some effective action.
A gun death may result from murder or from suicide. But in either case, the problem is caused by gun ownership. Gun death statistics clearly show that in ares where there are a larger number of homes with guns, the number of suicides is also high. Another study has revealed that about 60 percent of the homicides are attributable to gun death. With gun crime statistics clearly indicating that there is a strong positive correlation between gun ownership and the incidence of murders, the link between gun death and gun ownership is clearly indicated.
How do we the supporters of uncontrolled gun ownership react to the menace of gun death? They have a two pronged strategy. Either they block the very compiling of statistics by independent organizations or come out with irrelevant arguments to support gun ownership. It is reported that legislators supporting the National Rifles Association, NRA, the leading anti gun control lobby of the country, make it difficult for independent organizations like the National Institute of Health even to study gun violence by creating rules that will obstruct their task. Perhaps they are forced to do this since they are threatened by the NRA that they would face defeat in the primaries if they do not support the cause of the anti gun control groups. So gun death seems to be of no consequence to some people! It is for the people involved in the gun control debate to bring the issue of gun death to the limelight.
A gun control essay is something we come across in a newspaper or journal. There is a subtle distinction between a gun control article and a gun control essay in that an essay is more formal than an article. It uses a professional language and tone. But I think a good gun control essay should focus more on the content than on the tone. Otherwise there will be no difference between something described as a gun control essay and the plethora of gun control articles that flood the print media every day!
How will a gun control essay counter the argument of anti gun control lobbyists that gun ownership is a sovereign right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment? Instead of dismissing this argument casually, a gun control essay can bring out the information that about 99 percent of the 2nd amendment was the work of people who had no legal education. Not only that, 99 percent of these people have had no college education either, though this fact does not have to belittle their qualification for the task entrusted to them. This revelation will make people realize that drafting a strong gun control law will mean no disrespect to the people behind the 2nd amendment since their perspective was different.
Gun crime statistics have a crucial role in helping people to weigh the gun control pros and cons and decide whether gun control legislation is needed or not. But the legislators who have sided with the National Rifles Association (NRA) scuttle the efforts of compiling gun death statistics by making it difficult for independent bodies like the national institute of Health even to study gun violence. Some of the legislators are forced to adopt these tactics because they are threatened by the NRA that they would be defeated even in primaries thus denying them the chance to contest elections! It is the duty of a gun control essay to expose these dubious ways of the anti gun legislation groups and their supporters.
A gun control essay should highlight publicly made available statistics that the US has a highly disproportionate share of 50 percent of the private guns in the world, while having only 5 percent of the world’s population.