Some people seem to believe that we do not need gun control laws. While there has been a demand that we need a stronger gun control law to check the growing incidence of gun crime, the anti gun control group will like to have uncontrolled gun ownership. This group is led by the NRA (National Rifles Association)whose cherished objective is to make gun ownership free of any restrictions. The NRA does not bother about participating in the gun control debate and has made no secret of its decision to stick to its stand, whatever gun crime statistics may say.
To the supporters of NRA, gun control pros and cons are of no value. They just keep harping on their pet argument that owning guns is a right given to the people of the United States by the 2nd amendment. But the fact is that nearly 99 percent of the second amendment was based on the inputs provided by people who had no college education. While this fact does not make their contribution unimportant, it does indicate that there may be nothing wrong in amending this law. The 2nd amendment itself being an amendment, what can be wrong in amending a provision of this amendment?
The need for strengthening gun control laws is clearly shown by gun death statistics. What is the picture presented by these statistics? The figures show that every year, there are 30,000 deaths in the US on account of gun violence. Gun control facts also show that in a majority of homicide crimes, guns are being used as murder weapons. Guns are used in as much as 60 percent of the murders. Another disturbing fact is that nearly forty percent of the children living in the houses that have guns are aware of the places the guns are stored by their parents. This brings in the dangerous possibility of kids taking possession of guns and using it wrongly.
Though these facts have been brought to light by a number of gun control articles, some legislators supporting the NRA have turned a blind eye to them. They seem to be working against stricter gun control laws by their action in drafting rules that will block independent bodies like the National Institute of Health in their efforts at studying gun violence.
The term gun death is being increasingly used by many people because it has become so frequent a phenomenon. The issue of gun control is tied to the problem of gun death in that many people believe that stricter gun control laws will be able to check the number of incidents of gun death.
Some countries of the world have been concerned with the problem of gun death and tightened gun control laws. They have reported a dramatic improvement in the situation, as revealed by gun death statistics. Australia, for example, has found that it has been able to reduce the incidence of gun death by about 60 per cent after they brought in strict gun control laws.
Gun control facts reveal that the United States has the problem of too many guns owned by its people. This can be seen from the fact that people in the US own about half the number of all the privately owned guns in the world which is abnormal when considered along with the fact that the population of the United States is only about 5 percent of the population of the world! Such abnormal gun ownership is bound to result in an abnormal gun death rate. This is confirmed by gun death statistics that show that when the number of gun deaths is worked out for a population of 100,000 citizens, the US is ranked well below South Africa.
The stumbling block for the efforts to control gun death by controlling gun ownership is created by the anti gun control groups, of whom the National Rifles Association (NRA) is the most prominent. The NRA, which has never participated in a meaningful gun control debate, and seems to be totally unconcerned about gun crime statistics and has been using its power to influence the legislators. The NRA is reported to be threatening legislators that they will be defeated in the primaries due to the efforts of the NRA, if they choose to support proposals for stricter gun laws. The fact that some legislators have been framing rules which would make it difficult for organizations like the CDC from even making an assessment of the gun violence seeks to confirm the undue influence of the NRA on them.
Gun death statistics are staring at our faces. They demand that we take notice of what is happening around us and that we do something to bring down the incidence of gun death. Gun crime statistics have always been pointing towards the direction in which gun control has to move. The need of the hour is not more of a gun control debate but effective action by the government.
This is the picture presented by gun death statistics.
1) Our country has just 5 percent of the population of the world. But it has 50 percent of the guns in the world. We can be happy if our country shares a disproportionately high proportion of the resources of the world, not the privately owned guns of the world!
2) Another information presented by gun death statistics is that in homes that have guns, women and children face a higher risk of gun death. This is not a hypothesis but a scenario indicated by gun control facts. This fact demolishes the argument of the pro gun lobby that owning guns will make people safer since people can defend themselves from criminals.
3) Gun death statistics compiled over the world present an interesting picture. There are countries that have implemented strict gun control facts. The result has been that there are fewer murders. This shows that gun control does work.
4) Australia is one of those countries that have made the gun control laws tighter. Gun death statistics for this country show that gun violence has come down by about 60 percent . This is too emphatic a result that cannot be attributed to factors other than gun control.
5) Gun death has its effect on the economy as well. Gun death statistics for the United States show that the country has been suffering an annual loss of close to four billion dollars on account of gun crime.
We have spent enough time discussing the gun control pros and cons so thoroughly that nothing is left to be discussed. The only thing we need to do is to accept the severity of the problem as pointed out by gun death statistics and take steps to bring in a strong gun control legislation.
The title of this article may give the impression that we need to learn to live with gun death.No. What the title really seeks to convey is that we should do something to arrest the phenomenon of gun death which seems to be only going up, notwithstanding the assertions made by some people supporting uncontrolled gun ownership. I think that there will be no dispute about the fact that gun death is much different from natural death and even from accidental death and is highly preventable if only ourlegislators are willing to appreciate the scenario depicted by gun control facts and decide to take some effective action.
A gun death may result from murder or from suicide. But in either case, the problem is caused by gun ownership. Gun death statistics clearly show that in ares where there are a larger number of homes with guns, the number of suicides is also high. Another study has revealed that about 60 percent of the homicides are attributable to gun death. With gun crime statistics clearly indicating that there is a strong positive correlation between gun ownership and the incidence of murders, the link between gun death and gun ownership is clearly indicated.
How do we the supporters of uncontrolled gun ownership react to the menace of gun death? They have a two pronged strategy. Either they block the very compiling of statistics by independent organizations or come out with irrelevant arguments to support gun ownership. It is reported that legislators supporting the National Rifles Association, NRA, the leading anti gun control lobby of the country, make it difficult for independent organizations like the National Institute of Health even to study gun violence by creating rules that will obstruct their task. Perhaps they are forced to do this since they are threatened by the NRA that they would face defeat in the primaries if they do not support the cause of the anti gun control groups. So gun death seems to be of no consequence to some people! It is for the people involved in the gun control debate to bring the issue of gun death to the limelight.
Traditionally, a gun control debate will dwell on familiar arguments that have been heard several times by every one. But with new gun control facts emerging very frequently, the gun control debate has become more lively. There is no dearth of gun death statistics to be used in advancing the cause of tighter gun control laws. However,figures have to be correctly interpreted if they have to serve any purpose.
An argument that can be used in a gun control debate is about the share of gun death in homicides. Murders otherwise called homicides are committed by various means. The methods may vary from strangling with bare hands to killing with various kinds of weapons like guns, knives, clubs, sharp instruments etc. But surprisingly, a vast majority of homicides, 60 percent to be specific, are committed using guns. When this point is brought out in a gun control debate, people will realize the danger potential of guns.
Another factor that should be highlighted in a gun control debate is from the gun crime statistics. People who are interested in understanding gun control pros and cons will be definitely disturbed by the disclosure made in a gun control debate that 30,000 deaths per year result from guns in the United States.
A gun control debate can also bring about the link between different types of gun control facts by explaining how the different sets of statistics corroborate each other. The fact that nearly half of all the privately owned guns are in the US will be a shocking fact when viewed against the fact that the US population forms just 5 percent of the population of the world.
Unfortunately, a gun control debate may have no impact on certain groups. Notable among these is the National Rifles Association (NRA) which makes no secret of its policy that it will not compromise its opposition to any form of gun control. Since the NRA uses the concept of democracy to justify its stand, people interested in a gun control debate should enlighten the organization that democracy means a fight against tyranny and that gun control is a part of this fight.
A gun control essay is something we come across in a newspaper or journal. There is a subtle distinction between a gun control article and a gun control essay in that an essay is more formal than an article. It uses a professional language and tone. But I think a good gun control essay should focus more on the content than on the tone. Otherwise there will be no difference between something described as a gun control essay and the plethora of gun control articles that flood the print media every day!
How will a gun control essay counter the argument of anti gun control lobbyists that gun ownership is a sovereign right guaranteed by the 2nd amendment? Instead of dismissing this argument casually, a gun control essay can bring out the information that about 99 percent of the 2nd amendment was the work of people who had no legal education. Not only that, 99 percent of these people have had no college education either, though this fact does not have to belittle their qualification for the task entrusted to them. This revelation will make people realize that drafting a strong gun control law will mean no disrespect to the people behind the 2nd amendment since their perspective was different.
Gun crime statistics have a crucial role in helping people to weigh the gun control pros and cons and decide whether gun control legislation is needed or not. But the legislators who have sided with the National Rifles Association (NRA) scuttle the efforts of compiling gun death statistics by making it difficult for independent bodies like the national institute of Health even to study gun violence. Some of the legislators are forced to adopt these tactics because they are threatened by the NRA that they would be defeated even in primaries thus denying them the chance to contest elections! It is the duty of a gun control essay to expose these dubious ways of the anti gun legislation groups and their supporters.
A gun control essay should highlight publicly made available statistics that the US has a highly disproportionate share of 50 percent of the private guns in the world, while having only 5 percent of the world’s population.